![]() ![]() That will yield far superior S/N - averaging will rarely, if ever, be required - and will not corrupt the linear portion of the speaker's IR. Or you can just apply a log sweep and deconvolve the output with the original sweep to get the IR. Taken far enough with an impulse input of sufficiently low magnitude, this could, in principle, result in a valid IR from an actual impulse stimulus. NOTE: The unregistered Voxengo Deconvolver demo version does not allow batch processing and is limited to 3 deconvolution per program's session. Load the original and recorded files in the program and they will be processed to create the impulse response. Every doubling of the number of averaged IRs will improve S/N by 3dB. Voxengo's Voxengo Deconvolver works well. You can improve S/N by taking multiple IRs and averaging them. When applied to a speaker, a valid (recorded or generated) impulse will frequently either drive the speaker into substantial nonlinear behavior, fail to produce an adequate signal/noise ratio, or both. Recording the speaker's response to that signal will therefore not yield a valid impulse response.ΔΆ. Connecting and disconnecting a battery will not apply a valid impulse to a speaker. If it was serious, then it is completely in error. Click to expand.My assumption was that the statement you're asking about was made tongue-in-cheek. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |